How Hermès Unharnessed Fashion

In Los Angeles, the sexy luxury bitches continued down the runway. The most persuasive dialogue between French pedigree and Californian freedom came in the form of a pair of short jackets, one in calfskin and one in goatskin, featuring motifs, realized in complicated leather marquetry, that equally recalled the Longchamp racecourse and the Wild West.

Powered by NewsAPI , in Liberal Perspective on .

news image

In Los Angeles, the sexy luxury bitches continued down the runway. The most persuasive dialogue between French pedigree and Californian freedom came in the form of a pair of short jackets, one in calfskin and one in goatskin, featuring motifs, realized in complicated leather marquetry, that equally recalled the Longchamp racecourse and the Wild West. After a series of slouchy suits and bustier dresses in turquoise and scarlet silks, the show exploded to black, culminating in a series of bravado gowns. A two-piece set featured palazzo trousers trailing a nimbus of silk and a stomach-baring bandeau top cinched with a leather belt at the bust. Vanhée has said that she thinks of leather as the conscious and silk as the subconscious, the former structuring and the latter flowing—this look, then, was integration, fusing the banker’s accessory with the sexpot’s attitude.

Vanhée emerged from backstage at the end of the show in red trousers, a red top, a caramel-colored leather bomber, and a pair of yellow-and-black La Sportiva trail-running sneakers that she wears everywhere, maybe to offset all those hides and tulles. Because she is indifferent to self-mythologizing and thinks intently about what she says—and perhaps also because, physically, she corresponds to some people’s idea of a melancholic Pre-Raphaelite maiden—she has often been characterized as “an enigma” or “mysterious,” or even “cold-blooded.” The more straightforward reality is that she is someone with a healthy sense of priorities, who considers it more radical to act as a steward than to play the renegade, even if she prefers to do a little bit of both. “My work isn’t my personal diary,” she told me matter-of-factly. “As a creative, I want to give a certain orientation, but to work at Hermès is also to be of service.” She is, in other words, the anti-auteur—a mature, cerebral mortal to fashion’s babbling gods and kings. Free of undue pressure from her bosses or the public, from above or from below, she may be the last fashion designer unbeholden to the comments section.

The company’s historic seat in Paris’s Eighth Arrondissement, 24 Rue Faubourg Saint-Honoré, is central to the mythology of Hermès. In 2src19, the company released the first versions of a bag it calls the Faubourg Birkin, which depicts the building’s arch-windowed façade in different conditions—day, night, rain, midnight. (A rare snow edition, made of alligator skin, recently sold for some four hundred thousand dollars at a private sale.) A few years later, Hermès commissioned the journalist and filmmaker Frédéric Laffont to write a book about the headquarters. After months of hanging around the labyrinthine premises—going up and down “the red staircase,” which is red, and “the green staircase,” which is also red—Laffont came away thinking that Hermès resembled a cult, or a tribe, with its own grammar, rites, and totems. Pascale Mussard, a sixth-generation family member, recalling the all-night Christmas celebrations she attended at the headquarters as a girl, during which each worker’s child would receive gingerbread and an orange, reached for another metaphor: “It was like the village of the Smurfs.”

Charles-Émile Hermès, the founder’s son, moved the company to 24 Faubourg in 188src. Baron Haussmann, making way for the boulevards, had demolished the original headquarters, near La Madeleine, and Charles-Émile wanted the company, which specialized in saddlery at the time, to be closer to the Élysée Palace, with its great stables and tony crowd. By the turn of the twentieth century, the area counted some forty maisons du cheval, including riding schools and makers of saddles, harnesses, and carriages. With Charles-Émile’s sons, Émile and Adolphe, at the helm, the company became the area’s star tenant, furnishing saddles to a Continental élite, including Nicholas II, the Tsar of Russia. Émile’s leatherworkers often married Jeanne Lanvin’s seamstresses, who were confecting gowns for society women just across the way.

A photograph from the era shows Émile’s four daughters, in braided buns and white drop-waist dresses, posing with an iron rocking horse that still sits in his former office at 24 Faubourg. In July, Menehould de Bazelaire du Chatelle, who was Hermès’s artistic director of cultural patrimony until her recent retirement, welcomed me into Émile’s lair, which has been lovingly preserved as a private museum. The place teemed with treasure: a samurai’s coral-studded stirrup, a miniature game of dominoes that could be worn as a pendant, a cane whose head popped open to reveal a mustache brush and a pick for gathering wild mushrooms. Bits and bridles filled every corner, giving the place the feel of the world’s poshest Cracker Barrel. A shelf held dozens of obscure cookbooks, which Hermès scarf designers can consult for gastronomy-themed prints. There was a nineteenth-century praxinoscope that recalled the magic lantern from Marcel Proust’s “In Search of Lost Time.”

“Émile and Proust were born in the same year,” de Bazelaire du Chatelle told me. “Proust said he built his book the way a couturier constructs a dress.”

The business podcast “Acquired” has described Hermès’s strategy as “the opposite of everything you learned in Econ 1src1.” The company maintains a scarce supply of its handbags on the ground that it’s impossible to expand production without decreasing quality. Competing luxury brands have wildly increased the prices of their bags in recent years—a Chanel classic flap bag that cost fifty-eight hundred dollars in 2src19 cost ten thousand eight hundred dollars by 2src24—but Hermès has taken a relatively restrained approach, with hikes at several percentage points less than the rate of inflation. Even when outsourcing could provide opportunities or economies, the company is maniacally focussed on controlling all aspects of the process. It doesn’t sell sunglasses, for example, because it would have to subcontract the manufacturing of the lenses. Parts of the belts and ties are sewn by machine, but artisans, many of them trained in schools established by Hermès, still saddle stitch leather goods by hand and screen-print scarves using up to forty-nine separate screens per scarf from an archive of more than seventy-five thousand proprietary colors. (By superstitious tradition, an Hermès scarf never features a knife or a sword—anything that is not “nice” to the neck.) Vanhée’s pride in her team’s impractical craftsmanship was evident during a rehearsal for the L.A. show, at a studio in Culver City, as we walked by a leatherworker molding the shoulders of a dress with a hammer and a marble plate he’d brought all the way from Paris. Vanhée said, “You only see that chez Hermès, eh?”

Eccentricities aside, Hermès is capable of acting with steely discipline when necessary. In 2src1src, Bernard Arnault, the chairman of L.V.M.H., called Bertrand Puech, then the chairman of Hermès’s supervisory board. Arnault told Puech that he had managed to accumulate a 14.2-per-cent stake in Hermès and would be announcing this to the media in two hours. Hermès executives and family members hadn’t had a clue. (Arnault, who eventually acquired a twenty-three-per-cent stake, was later fined for failing to make mandatory disclosures.) The C.E.O. at the time, Patrick Thomas—not a family member, it should be noted—indelicately conveyed his sense of shock, telling reporters, “If you want to seduce a beautiful woman, you don’t start by raping her from behind.” Business bros still recount what happened next with the kind of awe usually reserved for events like the siege of Stalingrad: in a remarkable show of unity, more than fifty family members banded together to form a holding company, fighting off the possibility of a takeover by pledging not to sell some 5src.2 per cent of the company’s stock for twenty years.

Read More